Ethanol has become a campaign issue in many areas, with political candidates often trying to outdo each other in proving how supportive they are of domestic fuels.
Take Missouri, for example. This story from the Columbia Missourian reports: There’s consensus on ethanol among the candidates for state representative seats in two rural Missouri districts: It’s good for farmers, good for the country and good for the economy, they say, but there’s not much more the state can do — at least for now — to encourage its use.
In the Missouri Senate race, Republican incumbent Jim Talent and Democrat Claire McCaskill both say they support alternative fuels such as ethanol, but McCaskill has raised objections to last year’s federal energy legislation that includes a renewable fuels standard. Talent is a strong supporter of the RFS and was instrumental in getting it included in the final energy bill passed by Congress. Both have traded barbs in campaign ads over who has done more or less for the ethanol industry, with the McCaskill camp claiming Talent voted against ethanol for 18 years.


Kansas City-based
Reports from the
Illinois Farm Bureau is trying to get the good news about ethanol out in two ways – a new blog and some cute and corny TV spots posted on YouTube. 
A new survey from the Biotechnology Industry Organization (BIO) shows strong support for government investment in biofuels research.
Public meetings are part of the process of bringing an ethanol plant to any community. Plans must be presented and concerns addressed. 
Back to back speeches by
One question that continues to be asked in regard to corn ethanol production is how it will affect the global supply of food for both humans and animals. It was a primary topic of discussion at the Advancing Renewable Energy Conference last week in St. Louis. 